
Considering approach for a news article
I think we need to be careful here. It's important to ask for clarification about what the user wants. A good strategy might be to ask a quick question like, "Do you want me to write a news article, analyze possible implications, or verify authenticity?"
If they want a balanced analysis of potential youth policy in Chinese football, we can approach it speculatively. It’s essential that we specify that it's a speculative piece and not present it as factual. Lastly, we should stick to our guidelines and stay concise.Planning response options
I can respond by asking the user for clarification. Something like: "Do you want me to: 1) write a brief article, 2) analyze potential roster impacts, 3) list affected players (with your sources), or 4) verify the information (with a link)?"
After we clarify, I could offer a brief high-level analysis of the implications if the claims are true, addressing advantages and risks. It seems they want an expansion into a sports article, so I could propose writing a more detailed commentary piece. I'll keep everything concise and use phrases like "如果属实" to avoid asserting claims as facts.
这是个爆点标题。你希望我做哪种输出?
- 写一篇600-800字的评论/解读稿(导语+背景+影响+风险+对策)
- 做阵容与年龄结构分析(位置分布、平均年龄、替代人选清单)
- 拟一份“换代”行动方案(时间线、原则、沟通与过渡预案)
- 核查消息真伪与来源可靠性(需要你提供原链接)

如果没有官方来源,我可以先按“若消息属实”写一篇评论并给出可能受影响的类型与位置分布,而不点名具体球员。要不要直接这样来?
.gif)